No Wonder Satan Gets into the Saddle

Like Granny Said~

God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That you might be justified in your sayings, and might overcome when you are judged

16194965_1621516291208906_6714508555733913447_n

The Connection Has Been Broken?

Should Christians Observe it? ~ Dr. Scott Johnson

Most pastors, teachers and Christians, believe that time has diminished the pagan meanings of X Mass. Has it really?

“The ‘Connection’ Has Been Broken” — There are those who clearly recognize the pagan nature of the various Christmas worship forms and practices. Nevertheless, many of these Christians claim that because of the long passage of time from their pagan inception to the present (6,000 years?), the “connection” to paganism has been sufficiently diminished to allow the adoption of these forms and practices into our Christian worship and celebration. While it may be true that most symbols have lost their original demonic meaning and significance in a modern society, it is strangely bizarre and ironic that Christendom seeks to commemorate Christ’s birth with the faded symbols of Satan. And even though some of God’s people may be naive and ignorant about the source of these things, surely God is not. Can such things please Him? And think about this — if it were possible to “disconnect” current practices from their pagan/occultic roots, why does Scripture not provide us any guidelines as to:
(a) how much time is necessary for the “neutralization”/disassociation process to occur; and
(b) which of the hundreds of ancient pagan rites would then be acceptable for adaptation into Christian worship (since some are obviously much more pagan/occultic than others)?

Read more here

Proper Seperation

“Divisions and separations are most objectionable in religion. They weaken the cause of true Christianity… But before we blame people for them, we must be careful that we lay the blame where it is deserved. False doctrine and heresy are even worse than schism. If people separate themselves from teaching that is positively false and unscriptural, they ought to be praised rather than reproved. In such cases separation is a virtue and not a sin.”

– J.C. Ryle

What is Legalism?

I see many Christians using this word toward Christians who obey God’s holy Word where they, the accusers, think there is liberty in a certain matter.  So, maybe this will help clear things up for those who use this terminolgy, even if you think you are right to use it.

From: Are You Legalistic? Legalism, Grace, and the Motivation for Obedience  By Dr. Robert G. Spinney

I. Were the Puritans Legalistic?

For several years I served as a professor at a conservative Christian college in the Chicago area. Perhaps ninety percent of my students had been reared in Christian homes and went to what we would call conservative, evangelical, Bible-believing churches. This always made for interesting classes. Although most of my classes were in American history, if I was quick on my feet, I could get into meaty spiritual issues, regardless of what subject I was teaching.

Indeed I recall one day in a U.S. history class where we were studying the Puritans. My students had read Edmund Morgan’s The Puritan Dilemma, a delightful biography of John Winthrop that discussed the founding of the Massachusetts Bay Colony in the 1620s. This book talked about the Puritans coming to America, their first years in North America, and their attempt to establish a Christian commonwealth.

It was an amazing story. This collection of godly men and women, most of whom were deeply committed to the Word of God, left families behind in Europe to come to an unknown and undeveloped America. That meant that they arrived in a wilderness with no politicians, no states, and no economy. They had to build a community from scratch. For the Puritans, this errand into the wilderness was a holy experiment.

So my students read this book about the Puritans.

If nothing else, what the Puritans tried to do was admirable. They tried to be serious about this holy experiment; they tried to apply the Word of God to every aspect of life.

I could tell during our class discussion, however, that even though my students had read this biography, and even though the book gave a favorable portrayal of the Puritans, my students did not share my love for the Puritans. They didn’t like these guys. They wouldn’t come out and say it, but you could tell that they weren’t regarding the Puritans as their spiritual heroes.

At some point in the discussion I stopped, and I asked my students, “Was there something wrong with the Puritans? You all seem kind of reserved, as if you don’t like these guys.” My students were silent. Finally one of my students, one of my brightest students, said, “Well, you know, the Puritans were . . er, . . . they were legalistic.”

I said, “They were legalistic?”

He answered, “Yeah, they were legalistic.”

I looked at my students and said, “Do you all agree with that? How many of the rest of you think that the Puritans were legalistic?”

Almost every hand went up.

So I went to the chalkboard, and I wrote down the word legalistic. Then I asked my class, “Would someone define that word for me, please.”

Silence.

So I waited. Finally I baited them. “Just give me an idea; just get us started. What does that word mean; what does legalism mean?”

No one said a word.

I continued, “How many people have ever used the word legalism before?”

All the hands went up.

I asked, “Do you guys think the Puritans were legalistic?”

Again all the hands went up.

“Can you tell me what it means?”

No definitions were offered.

Finally my one student, my bright student, said with much hesitation, “Well, they were just like, er, so concerned with obeying God all the time.”

As he spoke, you could tell he realized that this wasn’t a very good definition.

I asked, “Isn’t it good to obey God all the time? What’s wrong with obedience?”

Silence. Nobody said anything.

Pointing again to the word I had written on the blackboard, I again asked, “Can anybody define this word?”

Let me tell you about my students. Even though this was a conservative Christian college, the students never used the word eschatology, they never used the word justification, and they rarely used the word sanctification. But they could deploy the word legalism at the right moments; they knew that word.

Finally after a long period of silence, my good student, my bright student, said, “I think you’ve convinced us that we really don’t know what that word means.”

I suspect that this situation is not unusual. Legalism and legalistic are words that we Christians use with reckless abandon. Yet I’m not sure that we can define this word accurately. In fact, I am fully confident that if I were to pass out index cards and ask the men here in our church to define the word legalism, we would get at least ten different definitions. But that doesn’t stop us from using the word. We use the word all the time, as if we knew what it meant, and as if we all meant the same thing when we used it.

I think this is a bad assumption. I don’t think the students in my classroom were that unusual at all. I think they were a typical representation of conservative, evangelical, Bible- believing Christians in America. We are not sure what legalism is, despite our frequent use of the term.

Read the rest here

Are You a Foolish X Mass Celebrant?

The foolish refusal to relinquish the Xmas holiday causes people to hold our Gospel in contempt. For the sake of our Xmas fun, we put a stumbling block before the unsaved. We WILL be held accountable.

‘That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.’

Read full post here.

Well said, Susan!

God is Insulted

“To devise any image of God is in itself impious; because by this corruption His Majesty is adulterated, and He is figured to be other than He is. … as soon as any one has permitted himself to devise an image of God, he immediately falls into false worship. And surely whosoever reverently and soberly feels and thinks about God Himself, is far from this absurdity; nor does any desire or presumption to metamorphose God ever creep in, except when coarse and carnal imaginations occupy our minds. …let us recollect that God is insulted, not only when His worship is transferred to idols (editor’s note: via X Mass and Easter), but when we try to represent Him by any outward similitude.” — John Calvin

Why Catholics Are NOT Christians!

The Catholic Church is a blend of Semiramis worship and Roman Emperor worship. Long ago, in ancient Babylon, was a pagan system of worship that was based on the Queen of Babylon, Semiramis and her infant “god” son, Damu. This paganism had spread throughout the ancient world and after Christ came in the flesh, and as the church grew and eventually became corrupted, the Catholic priests who went about the world evangelizing encountered this mother goddess and child wherever they went no matter what culture they came upon.

mary-shrine-2To make “conversion” to “Christianity” easier, the priests incorporated this paganism into the church. They changed Semiramis to Mary. They changed her son, Damu, to Jesus. Hence the Madonna and child was transferred from ancient Babylon and incorporated into the teachings of the church. No wonder God refers to this corrupt, perverted “church” as “the whore of Babylon”! (A spiritual slut) See Revelation 17:4-6.

Likewise, as the Roman Empire lost ground, and the emperor became weaker, the pope grew up in his place and eventually replaced the Roman emperor. So emperor worship was also incorporated into this perverted bride, and displayed in the position of the pope.

And that is why we see elements both of Rome and of Babylon in the Catholic Church and find allusions to both in references to the whore in the book of Revelation.

Some links for your further study of Semiramis:

SEMIRAMIS, QUEEN OF BABYLON Matous Losuta  and the Catholic coming deception