Calvin’s Quotes on Christmas

I know how difficult it is to persuade the world that God disapproves of all modes of worship not expressly sanctioned by His Word. The opposite persuasion which cleaves to them, being seated, as it were, in their very bones and marrow, is, that whatever they do has in itself a sufficient sanction, provided it exhibits some kind of zeal for the honor of God. But since God not only regards as frivolous, but also plainly abominates, whatever we undertake from zeal to His worship, if at variance with His command, what do we gain by a contrary course? The words of God are clear and distinct, “Obedience is better than sacrifice.” “In vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men,” 1 Sam. 15:22; Matt. 15:9. Every addition of His word, especially in this matter, is a lie. Mere “will worship” (ethelothreeskia) is vanity [Col. 2:23]. This is the decision, and when once the judge has decided, it is no longer time to debate.[13]

In speaking of various corruptions of worship, Calvin comments:

I come now to ceremonies, which, while they ought to be grave attestations of divine worship, are rather a mere mockery of God. A new Judaism, as a substitute for that which God has distinctly abrogated, has again been reared up by means of numerous puerile extravagancies, collected from different quarters; and with these have been mixed up certain impious rites, partly borrowed from the heathen, and more adapted to some theatrical show than to the dignity of our religion. The first evil here is, that an immense number of ceremonies, which God had by his authority abrogated, once for all, have been again revived. The next evil is, that while ceremonies ought to be living exercises of piety, men are vainly occupied with numbers of them that are both frivolous and useless. But by far the most deadly evil of all is, that after men have thus mocked God with ceremonies of one kind or other, they think they have fulfilled their duty as admirably as if these ceremonies included in the whole essence of piety and divine worship.[14]

And in yet more pointed remarks, Calvin says:

The mockery which worships God with nought but external gestures and absurd human fictions, how could we, without sin, allow to pass unrebuked? We know how much he hates hypocrisy, and yet in that fictitious worship, which was everywhere in use, hypocrisy reigned. We hear how bitter the terms in which the prophets inveigh against all worship fabricated by human rashness. But a good intention, i.e., an insane license of daring whatever man pleased, was deemed the perfection of worship. For it is certain that in the whole body of worship which had been established, there was scarcely a single observance which had an authoritative sanction from the Word of God.

We are not in this matter to stand either by our own or by other men’s judgments. We must listen to the voice of God, and hear in what estimation he holds that profanation of worship which is displayed when men, overleaping the boundaries of His Word, run riot in their own inventions. The reasons which he assigns for punishing the Israelites with blindness, after they had lost the pious and holy discipline of the Church, are two, viz., the prevalence of hypocrisy, and will-worship (ejqeloqrhskeiva), meaning thereby a form of worship contrived by man. “Forasmuch,” says he, “as the people draw near me with their mouth, and with the lips do honor me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men; therefore I will proceed to do a marvellous work among this people, even a marvellous work and a wonder: for the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid,” Isa. 29:13-14. When God stirred us up, a similar or worse perversity openly domineered throughout the Church. While God, then, was thundering from heaven, were we to sit quiet?[15]

Thus, Calvin’s writings on worship clearly enunciate the concept which has subsequently been called the regulative principle of worship: all modes of worship must be expressly sanctioned by God’s word, if they are to be considered legitimate. Since Christmas observances, and other ecclesiastical festivals, are not commanded in the scriptures, they fail to meet divine approval, even if there were no additional objections to them.

Source: http://www.swrb.com/newslett/actualNLs/Xmas_ch2.htm

“The Greatest Forgery Lucifer Ever Made” – Leonard Ravenhill

Pleasing God

There are many things which it would be pleasing to God for us to do which He has not specifically commanded us. A true child is not content with merely doing those things which his father specifically commands him to do. He studies to know his father’s will, and if he thinks that there is any thing that he can do that would please his father, he does it gladly, though his father has never given him any specific order to do it. So it is with the true child of God. He does not ask merely whether certain things are commanded or certain things forbidden. He studies to know his Father’s will in all things.There are many Christians today who are doing things that are not pleasing to God, and leaving undone things which would be pleasing to God. When you speak to them about these things they will confront you at once with the question, “Is there any command in the Bible not to do this thing?” And if you cannot show them some verse in which the matter in question is plainly forbidden, they think they are under no obligation whatever to give it up; but a true child of God does not demand a specific command. If we make it our study to find out and to do the things which are pleasing to God, He will make His study to do the things which are pleasing to us. Here again we find the explanation of much unanswered prayer. We are not making it the study of our lives to know what would please our Father, and so our prayers are not answered.

How to Pray by R.A. Torrey

You Cannot Fool God

You cannot put a mask of Christianity on the mother/child goddess worship of the pagans and think it pleases God. He knows what is under that mask.

Some thoughts~

Why would any pastor teach scriptures unlawfully to make the Apostles agree that paganism can be christianized (Romans 14:5-6) except that they love these “holy” days of X Mass and Easter, and/or their children above God? Perhaps they have a fear of man or their wives. I have yet to hear a pastor or teacher who can show, with correct interpretation, scriptures that truly mean we have liberty to celebrate christianized pagan (an oxymoron) “holy” days. Why didn’t the Apostles agree to such a wicked thing when the converted former pagans of their day were burning to ashes all the books of their ungodly pagan worship (Acts 19:19)? Isn’t it adding to God’s Word to say it’s OK to christianize pagan holidays? Isn’t it subtracting from the Word to ignore scriptures warning us not to partake in pagan practices to worship God with (Deuteronomy 12; Jeremiah 10)? And isn’t it outright disobedience to God’s Word when we are told not to combine the holy with the unholy (Leviticus 10:10; Job 14:4); to touch not the unclean things (2 Corinthians 6:17); to have nothing to do with the things of idols (1 John 5:21)?

I find it quite interesting that pastors will, rightly so, condemn idolatry in the lives of Christians yet this time of year the tree goes up and is decorated to honor God just as it was done by pagans to honor their sun god though God clearly tells us not to do such a wicked thing in our worship of Him (Deuteronomy 12). And then there are apologetics ministries that wish everyone a “Merry Christmas” yet correctly condemns the ministry of Youth With a Mission’s mission of telling the indigenous peoples that the god they worship is actually the true God (supposedly following Paul’s example on Mars Hill). And they are vehemently against the seeker friendly tactics of increasing the numbers of mega churches yet that is what the Church of Rome did with the pagans’ gods to build up the numbers of converts beginning in the days of Constantine when they started to christianize their idols and feast days. They condemn yoga exercises by their congregants, as they should, but see nothing amiss in their Christ Mass celebrations with the pagan tree set up next to the pulpit where God’s holy Word is preached (Exodus 20:3).

Has anyone actually pondered why they are bringing into their house a tree to decorate? Why are they practicing all of these pagan traditions this time of year? Does it truly enhance the Gospel? Are they not telling God, the Holy Spirit, He needs the help of the Christmas spirit this time of year to make His Gospel known to the World? Do they truly believe that God will reward them and/or be pleased with their efforts? How does one worship the most holy God with disobedience? Even the Wiccans and most unbelievers know this is a pagan “holy” day and they laugh at the Christians with their syncretic worship of God. Is it any wonder that unregenerate people believe that Christianity came from paganism? That Jesus is just another god? That He is one of many ways to eternal life?

Christians who celebrate the Christ Mass are far from being set apart from the world at this time of year…

Like Granny Said~

God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That you might be justified in your sayings, and might overcome when you are judged

16194965_1621516291208906_6714508555733913447_n

Galatians 4:16

What is Legalism?

I see many Christians using this word toward Christians who obey God’s holy Word where they, the accusers, think there is liberty in a certain matter.  So, maybe this will help clear things up for those who use this terminolgy, even if you think you are right to use it.

From: Are You Legalistic? Legalism, Grace, and the Motivation for Obedience  By Dr. Robert G. Spinney

I. Were the Puritans Legalistic?

For several years I served as a professor at a conservative Christian college in the Chicago area. Perhaps ninety percent of my students had been reared in Christian homes and went to what we would call conservative, evangelical, Bible-believing churches. This always made for interesting classes. Although most of my classes were in American history, if I was quick on my feet, I could get into meaty spiritual issues, regardless of what subject I was teaching.

Indeed I recall one day in a U.S. history class where we were studying the Puritans. My students had read Edmund Morgan’s The Puritan Dilemma, a delightful biography of John Winthrop that discussed the founding of the Massachusetts Bay Colony in the 1620s. This book talked about the Puritans coming to America, their first years in North America, and their attempt to establish a Christian commonwealth.

It was an amazing story. This collection of godly men and women, most of whom were deeply committed to the Word of God, left families behind in Europe to come to an unknown and undeveloped America. That meant that they arrived in a wilderness with no politicians, no states, and no economy. They had to build a community from scratch. For the Puritans, this errand into the wilderness was a holy experiment.

So my students read this book about the Puritans.

If nothing else, what the Puritans tried to do was admirable. They tried to be serious about this holy experiment; they tried to apply the Word of God to every aspect of life.

I could tell during our class discussion, however, that even though my students had read this biography, and even though the book gave a favorable portrayal of the Puritans, my students did not share my love for the Puritans. They didn’t like these guys. They wouldn’t come out and say it, but you could tell that they weren’t regarding the Puritans as their spiritual heroes.

At some point in the discussion I stopped, and I asked my students, “Was there something wrong with the Puritans? You all seem kind of reserved, as if you don’t like these guys.” My students were silent. Finally one of my students, one of my brightest students, said, “Well, you know, the Puritans were . . er, . . . they were legalistic.”

I said, “They were legalistic?”

He answered, “Yeah, they were legalistic.”

I looked at my students and said, “Do you all agree with that? How many of the rest of you think that the Puritans were legalistic?”

Almost every hand went up.

So I went to the chalkboard, and I wrote down the word legalistic. Then I asked my class, “Would someone define that word for me, please.”

Silence.

So I waited. Finally I baited them. “Just give me an idea; just get us started. What does that word mean; what does legalism mean?”

No one said a word.

I continued, “How many people have ever used the word legalism before?”

All the hands went up.

I asked, “Do you guys think the Puritans were legalistic?”

Again all the hands went up.

“Can you tell me what it means?”

No definitions were offered.

Finally my one student, my bright student, said with much hesitation, “Well, they were just like, er, so concerned with obeying God all the time.”

As he spoke, you could tell he realized that this wasn’t a very good definition.

I asked, “Isn’t it good to obey God all the time? What’s wrong with obedience?”

Silence. Nobody said anything.

Pointing again to the word I had written on the blackboard, I again asked, “Can anybody define this word?”

Let me tell you about my students. Even though this was a conservative Christian college, the students never used the word eschatology, they never used the word justification, and they rarely used the word sanctification. But they could deploy the word legalism at the right moments; they knew that word.

Finally after a long period of silence, my good student, my bright student, said, “I think you’ve convinced us that we really don’t know what that word means.”

I suspect that this situation is not unusual. Legalism and legalistic are words that we Christians use with reckless abandon. Yet I’m not sure that we can define this word accurately. In fact, I am fully confident that if I were to pass out index cards and ask the men here in our church to define the word legalism, we would get at least ten different definitions. But that doesn’t stop us from using the word. We use the word all the time, as if we knew what it meant, and as if we all meant the same thing when we used it.

I think this is a bad assumption. I don’t think the students in my classroom were that unusual at all. I think they were a typical representation of conservative, evangelical, Bible- believing Christians in America. We are not sure what legalism is, despite our frequent use of the term.

Read the rest here